Yardi alternative · Comparison guide
Yardi vs Looset: Complete Comparison Guide
Yardi has been the industry standard for decades, but modern property management requires modern tools. See how Looset compares to Yardi on implementation speed, automation capabilities, user experience, and ROI—and why teams are choosing to replace Yardi entirely, not just bolt on more point solutions.
Yardi vs Looset
| Feature | Yardi | Looset |
|---|---|---|
Implementation Time | 3-6 months with heavy consulting | Days, not months |
Architecture | On-premise roots, old database design | Cloud native, real-time event-driven |
AI & Automation | Limited, AI tacked on as afterthought | Automation built in from day one, not bolted on |
User Experience | Complex, requires training | Intuitive, consumer-app feel |
APIs | Limited, closed ecosystem | Open APIs by default |
Updates | Slow change cycles, annual releases | Continuous deployment, weekly updates |
Three reasons teams switch from Yardi to Looset
Faster Implementation
Yardi implementations take months and require heavy consulting. Looset onboarding is measured in days, not months.
Automation that matches how you work
Yardi has limited automation features that can feel tacked on. Looset was designed around automated workflows from the start, so repetitive tasks happen in the background.
Modern User Experience
Yardi feels like enterprise software from 2010. Looset feels like a modern consumer app that your team will actually want to use.